The increasing use of 3D printers in industry and in the private sector has the potential to fundamentally change the manufacture and distribution of products. However, in addition to the technical possibilities, 3D printing also brings with it legal challenges, particularly in the areas of trademark law, design law, copyright law, patent law and competition law. In this blog post, you will find out what you need to look out for to avoid legal pitfalls and protect your company.
Rights to construction plans: what is permitted and what is not
Design plans are the basis for manufacturing products using 3D printing. However, caution is required here in particular, as the use of these plans can have legal consequences in many respects.
Copyright
Construction plans can be protected by copyright if they have a sufficient degree of originality as personal intellectual creations. This means that the plans may only be reproduced, distributed or made publicly accessible with the consent of the author. Particularly in a commercial context, you must ensure that you have the appropriate rights of use in order to avoid legal disputes.
Attention: Even the private use of copyrighted construction plans can become problematic if these plans originate from illegal sources or have been reproduced without the author's permission.
Trademark and design law
In principle, construction plans are unproblematic in the private sphere. However, as soon as you leave the private sphere and use the plans commercially, the provisions of trademark and copyright law apply. Design rights. It is important to note that a Trademark infringement or design right infringement can occur not only through the sale of products, but also through the offering or distribution of protected design plans on the Internet. This also applies if the plans are offered free of charge.
Example: If you offer a construction plan for a spare part online under the name "Spare part for brand XY", this may constitute a trademark infringement, even if you do not sell the spare part yourself.
Patent and utility model law
The situation is similar in patent and utility model law. Although the private use of design plans is generally permitted, the distribution of such plans in the commercial sector without the consent of the rights holder may constitute an indirect infringement of patent or utility model law. It becomes particularly problematic if the design plans are made available online, as this can be regarded as unauthorized offering.
Attention: It remains to be seen how the courts will decide in future whether digital design plans are considered "means" within the meaning of patent law and can therefore constitute an infringement. However, caution is required here to avoid becoming embroiled in legal disputes.
Competition law
Competition law Design plans become particularly relevant if they were obtained dishonestly. If the plans were obtained through espionage, theft or betrayal of trade secrets, their use is not permitted and can lead to considerable legal consequences.
Reproduction of the work: Risks during production and distribution
The 3D printing of products itself also harbors numerous legal risks, especially if these products are protected by copyright, trademark, design or patent law.
Copyright
A work reproduced with a 3D printer can be protected by copyright if the original work reaches the necessary level of creativity. The production and distribution of copies without the consent of the rights holder constitutes copyright infringement. In the private sphere, limited reproductions for personal use are permitted, but the sale or public exhibition of such works without the consent of the copyright holder is illegal.
Example: If you reproduce a sculpture that is protected by copyright using 3D printing and then sell or exhibit it, you are infringing the creator's copyright.
Trademark and design law
The reproduction of a product protected by trademark or design law is only permitted in the private sphere. However, as soon as commercial use is made, for example by selling or exhibiting the products in a business environment, this may constitute an infringement of the owner's rights.
Case study: If you print a Lego brick with the Lego logo and use it in a commercial setting, this could constitute trademark infringement, even if the brick is not sold.
Patent law
In patent law, the challenge often lies in the fact that it is not just about the external appearance of a product, but also about the technical invention behind it. Even if the reprinted product looks different on the outside, it may still infringe patent law if it uses a patent-protected technology.
Example: If you replicate a gun that uses a patent-protected firing mechanism, this may constitute a patent infringement, even if the gun looks different from the original.
Competition law
In the commercial sector, the imitation of a product through 3D printing can lead to problems under competition law, especially if this creates a misrepresentation of origin or exploits the value of the original product.
Example: If you print a smartphone case with the Apple logo and sell it as an "Apple case for iPhone XY", you are misleading about the origin of the product and exploiting the reputation of the Apple brand. This constitutes an infringement of competition law.
Conclusion: Minimizing legal risks with 3D printing
3D printing opens up fascinating possibilities, but also brings with it a multitude of legal challenges. Whether using design plans or reproducing products, it is crucial to comply with applicable laws to avoid costly legal disputes. We recommend that you seek legal advice in good time to ensure that you are on the safe side.
Do you have questions about 3D printing and intellectual property? Get in touch with us! We will be happy to assist you and help you to protect your company legally.
English 
Deutsch 
Nederlands